Sign the Community Forest Consensus HERE

Defenders of Highline Forest COMMUNITY FOREST CONSENSUS

Nearly 3,800 community members, including 16 elected officials and 61 organizations and businesses, have signed the Community Forest Consensus. See public signers and read their comments HERE

CALLING FOR EMERGENCY ACTION AND LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS BY OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS TO DEFEND THE HEALTH OF PEOPLE IN THE NORTH SEATAC PARK COMMUNITY AND WITHIN TEN MILES OF SEATAC INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AS WELL AS THE STABILILTY OF OUR CLIMATE BY PROTECTING THIS COMUNITY’S GUARDIAN FORESTS, WATERWAYS, PARKLANDS, AND TREES

In order to defend the people in the community surrounding North SeaTac Park, and all who live within the ten-mile community surrounding this airport, from the negative health and climate impacts posed by near-term plans for extensive deforestation and green space destruction by the Port of Seattle, the current owner and assigned steward of North SeaTac Park,

… We Call for:

ONE

Legally-binding securement of North SeaTac Park as a Park in Perpetuity with a permanent prohibition, within the park, to commercial development and tree removal. This may be accomplished by changes in zoning and law, by conservation easement, by transfer or sale of this park land to an appropriate governmental entity, or by a combination of these or other means.

The Port caused the removal by eminent domain of thousands of residents, along with their homes and schools, from the land that this park now occupies. The Port has acknowledged that the creation of the park was “the culmination of a long term and very open planning process to compensate the area’s residents for cumulative airport impacts.” (1) This measure would honor that expressed intent of the Port.

TWO

An immediate moratorium on tree removal and green space destruction on public lands by the Port of Seattle within 2 miles of SeaTac International Airport with exceptions only for targeted measures to protect public safety or the health of the surrounding natural ecosystem, or to prevent substantial physical damage to existing private or public property, where these objectives cannot be reasonably achieved through other means.

This call for action responds to the recommendation of Public Health - Seattle & King County (PHS&KC) to increase green space and tree coverage, particularly coniferous trees, within ten miles of SeaTac International Airport in order to reduce human exposure to airport-generated pollutants known to cause disease and shorten lives. PHS&KC has found that, with severity increasing as proximity to the airport increases, lifespans in this area are between 1.7 and 5 years shorter than in the balance of the county; premature births, low birthweights, and childhood learning problems are more common; and rates of cancer and heart, respiratory, cardiovascular, and other diseases are significantly higher. (2)

Furthermore, this call is put forth to safeguard human health in a community where residents experience high levels of environmental health disparities as measured by the Washington State Department of Health. (3)

It holds the Port of Seattle and our greater community accountable to the principles of environmental justice under Presidential Executive Order 12898 as well as to US Department of Transportation Order 5610.2 which requires that activities that will have “a disproportionately high and adverse effect on minority populations or low-income populations” must be avoided or mitigated when practicable. (4, 5) As reported by PHS&KC, “the majority of people in King County identifying as Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander live in communities within 10 miles of the airport”, “a greater proportion of people in these communities are immigrants, and a slightly higher proportion are children,” and the percentage of people in near poverty or poverty increased the closer you are to the airport”, ranging from 37.2% - 24.4% within ten miles of the airport as compared with 16.1% in the balance of the county. These poverty rates are even higher for children. (2)

This moratorium must go into effect immediately in order to prevent the Port of Seattle from implementing its current Near Term Plans that would result in significant reduction of green space and tree coverage in this community, and must continue until the CARE Plan for the Greater North SeaTac Park Community, as outlined below, or a plan with comparable protections for our community’s health and our climate-stabilizing urban forest, is in place.

THREE

A plan for Comprehensive Action to Restore the Ecology of North SeaTac Park and Community (CARE Plan), by the Port of Seattle and other partnering jurisdictions, that is fully funded and professionally managed, in order to restore and maintain for future generations the natural areas within and surrounding North SeaTac Park, including forests and waterways, with emphasis on Tub Lake and its prehistoric peat bog, a type of wetland that is highly environmentally sensitive and increasingly rare in King County.

The plan must include control of invasive weeds and preparation for existing and expected climate impacts such as drought, high heat, and pests.

It must, in a manner and at a scale recommended by experts in urban forestry and public health, propose specific steps to implement the recommendation made by Public Health - Seattle & King County to increase green space and tree coverage, particularly coniferous trees, near SeaTac Airport in order to reduce residents’ exposure to toxics from airport operations. (3)

It must protect and retain existing trees, as large-diameter trees can capture more toxic particulates, store “disproportionally massive amounts of carbon,” and “fulfill a variety of unique ecological roles such as increasing drought-tolerance, reducing flooding from intense precipitation events, altering fire behavior, redistributing soil water, and acting as focal centers of mycorrhizal communication and resource sharing networks.” (6)

It should set a goal of restoring urban tree canopy coverage in this community from its current low averages, for example, of 21% in SeaTac (25% not including the airport), 30% in Burien, and 29% in Des Moines, to 40% or more, as recommended by Forterra NW in three studies that it prepared for the Port of Seattle Airport Community Ecology Fund. (7-9)

And it must include concrete actions to limit, as reasonably possible, development activities of the Port of Seattle within ten miles of the airport to its existing developed footprint. The Port controls sprawling multi-acre, single-level parking lots as well as other already-paved and underutilized properties, where redevelopment with higher density approaches are possible, feasible, and ecologically sound.

CITATIONS

  1. FAA Compliance Reviews of Airport Noise Land Use & Financial Operations: SeaTac International Airport, 2016, p. 11. (/https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/airports/airport_compliance/compliance_reviews/seattle-tacoma-international-airport-report.pdf) Accessed 12/6/24) Note: This document appears on the FAA website without a cover sheet.

  2. Community Health and Airport Operations Related Noise and Air Pollution: Report to the Legislature by Seattle-King County Department of Health in Response to Washington State HOUSE BILL 1109, December 1, 2020 (https://app.leg.wa.gov/ReportsToTheLegislature/Home/GetPDF?fileName=Community%20Health%20and%20Airport%20Operations%20Related%20Pollution%20Report_c7389ae6-f956-40ef-98a7-f85a4fab1c59.pdf Accessed 12/6/24)

  3. Washington State Department of Health Environmental Health Disparities Map (https://doh.wa.gov/data-and-statistical-reports/washington-tracking-network-wtn/washington-environmental-health-disparities-map Accessed 12/6/24)

  4. U.S. Presidential Executive Order 12898 (https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-executive-order-12898-federal-actions-address-environmental-justice Accessed 12/6/24)

  5. US Department of Transportation Order 5610.2 https://www.transportation.gov/transportation-policy/environmental-justice/department-transportation-order-56102aAccessed 12/6/24)

  6. Mildrexler DJ, Berner LT, Law BE, Birdsey RA and Moomaw WR (2020) Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. Front. For. Glob. Change 3:594274. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274 (Accessed 12/6/24)

  7. Green SeaTac Urban Forest Enhancement Guide, Forterra, City of SeaTac, Port of Seattle, 2019. Tree canopy cover for the City of SeaTac estimated at 21% for the entire city and 25% not including the airport, (p. 14). (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NKfENywJPy52ZTpVgnnvC_SuHvbk9__h/view)

  8. Green Burien Partnership Urban Forest Stewardship Guide, Forterra, City of Burien, Port of Seattle, 2019. Tree canopy cover for the City of Burien estimated at 30% on p. 10. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cl4gsPP_lc4C2NkLJR5UFwj4oae-a-43/view)

  9. Green Des Moines Partnership Urban Forest Enhancement Plan, Forterra, City of Des Moines, Port of Seattle, 2019. Tree canopy cover for the City of Des Moines estimated at 29% on p. 13. (https://forterra.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/GC_DesMoines-guide_032621_WEB.pdf Accessed 12/6/24)

  10. Seattle Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near Term Projects Environmental Review Process Scoping Information Documents prepared by Landrum & Brown Inc. for Port of Seattle, July 2018 (p. 11)  (https://www.airportprojects.net/sampntpenvironmentalreview/)

  11. Real Estate Strategic Plan: Port Commission Study Session, July 26, 2016, p 16-22.  (https://meetings.portseattle.org/portmeetings/attachments/2016/2016_07_26_SS_5_supp.pdf Accessed 12/6/24) And Port of Seattle 2020 Real Estate Strategic Plan, (https://www.portseattle.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/2020_Real_Estate_Strategic_Plan.pdf Accessed 12/6/24) August 2021.